• Users Online: 373
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
CASE REPORT
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 9  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 33-35

Space management with gerber space regainer


1 MDS Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Yaksha Dental Hospital and Implant Center, Bodeli, Chhota Udaipur, Gujarat, India
2 Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, K.M. Shah Dental College, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat, India

Date of Submission05-Apr-2021
Date of Decision02-Jun-2021
Date of Acceptance03-Jun-2021
Date of Web Publication17-Aug-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Bhavna Haresh Dave
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, K.M. Shah Dental College, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, Vadodara, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jihs.jihs_8_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Mesial migration of primary 2nd molar and 1st permanent molar occurs due to early exfoliation of primary first molar. Early exfoliation of deciduous teeth may lead to destruction in the integrity of normal occlusion. Early orthodontic procedures are often used to facilitate favorable developmental modifications in the developing occlusion. There are different space regaining methods described in literature. This case report presents a space regaining accomplished with distal movement of tooth by Gerber Space Regainer.

Keywords: Early exfoliation, Gerber appliance, interceptive orthodontics, premature loss, space regainer


How to cite this article:
Shah VU, Dave BH, Shah SS, Shah PS. Space management with gerber space regainer. J Integr Health Sci 2021;9:33-5

How to cite this URL:
Shah VU, Dave BH, Shah SS, Shah PS. Space management with gerber space regainer. J Integr Health Sci [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Dec 7];9:33-5. Available from: https://www.jihs.in/text.asp?2021/9/1/33/323957




  Introduction Top


The importance of healthy and well-aligned primary teeth lays a foundation for the future dental health of the child. An important aspect of this includes proper handling of space that was developed by the premature loss of deciduous teeth. The technique of space management is an art of treating space discrepancy problems in mixed dentition, for example, maintenance of leeway space.[1]

Early loss of deciduous teeth necessitates space maintenance because it leads to the formation of occlusal disharmonies. When space is gradually lost, however, intervention to recover it should be considered to avoid further disharmonies. Serial extractions, space regaining, and other methods are used to reduce or eliminate emerging irregularities and malocclusions. When there is no space for permanent teeth to erupt, a space regainer appliance can be used.[2],[3]

Space regainers are broadly classified into removable and fixed types. Removable space regainers mostly use springs and screws to regain the lost space.[4] Fixed space regainers such as sliding loop regainer, open coiled space regainer, lip bumper, distal jet appliance, and Gerber space regainer are some of the appliances listed in the literature for space regaining. The objective of space regaining is to recover the arch width and perimeter that have been lost.[5] Any interceptive procedures, such as any mesial/distal movement of teeth and space regaining, require accurate diagnosis. Because it is a fixed unit, patient cooperation is required, and oral hygiene must be maintained as the component is self-cleaning. In this case report, we have used a Gerber space regainer because it can be easily fabricated chair-side device that can be made in a reasonable amount of time because it does not need laboratory processes and significant results can be obtained within short time period.


  Case Report Top


A 9-year old male patient reported to the department of pediatric and preventive dentistry with a chief complaint of missing tooth in the lower left back tooth region. Past dental history had shown that the patient underwent extraction in the lower left back tooth region under local anesthesia in a private clinic. Lower left primary first molar (74) had been extracted. After extraction of 74 patient could not report for next dental visit or further treatment due to some circumstances. The patient then reported to the department after 3 months; on examination, we observed space loss in 74 region [Figure 1]. For further investigation, intraoral periapical radiograph [Figure 2]a and panoramic radiograph [Figure 2]b were taken and study models were prepared. Moyer's mixed dentition analysis showed that there was a space loss of 5 mm in the lower left quadrant. Therefore, treatment plan was made such that the space can be regained for eruption of permanent first premolar. The patient's parents were informed about the space loss and its consequences as well as importance of early intervention for the preservation of the loss of arch length.
Figure 1: Preoperative occlusal view of mandibular arch

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a)Preoperative periapical radiograph of 75 region; (b) Preoperative Orthopantomogram

Click here to view


The space regainer designed to regain space for erupting permanent first premolar was Gerber space regainer which was introduced by Bench R et al. in 1978. The primary left second molar was banded (0.005 × 0.180 × 2”) with molar tubes (0.7 mm diameter, 10 mm length) welded to band buccally as well as lingually; a 23-G wire was used with an open coil spring [Figure 3]. The assembly was cemented with type I glass-ionomer cement (luting) onto the tooth with the springs held in compression to half their lengths [Figure 4]. On follow-up visit of the patient, the space regained after 1 month was 4.8 mm [Figure 5]. The total space available between primary second molar and primary canine was approximately 7 mm. The appliance was removed once the permanent first premolar achieved contact with adjacent tooth [Figure 6].
Figure 3: Fabrication of Gerber space regainer

Click here to view
Figure 4: Post cementation of Gerber space regainer on 75

Click here to view
Figure 5: Follow up after one month

Click here to view
Figure 6: Postoperative occlusal view of mandibular arch

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


The early loss of primary molars causes a reduction in the arch length by mesial movement of the permanent first molar.[6] Children between age group 7 to 10 years proved to be best for regaining lost arch length as the roots of permanent first molar are incomplete at this age group and distalization of permanent molar becomes easier.[7]

Due to excellent spring back and superelasticity of nickel–titanium with minimal load fluctuation despite high deflection, it is possible to achieve massive tooth movement without needing to replace the springs because of this property.[8] There is no definitive evidence present regarding tooth movement which occurs after unilateral fixed/ removable appliance is used to distalize two teeth i.e. primary second molar and permanent first molar.

Around 1 mm per month distal movement has been reported for permanent first molars, but then again, there is distinct individual variation.[9] In the present case, the total space regained was 4.8 mm within 1 month of time period. Distalizing the permanent first molar was possible without difficulty in the present case because the root formation was incomplete, and no tipping was observed [Figure 7] and [Figure 8].[10]
Figure 7: Postoperative periapical radiograph of 75 region

Click here to view
Figure 8: Postoperative Orthopantomogram

Click here to view


Management of space problems in the mixed dentition plays a vital role in pediatric dental practice. Understanding how the deciduous and mixed dentitions develop can assist in assessing when and how to intervene malocclusion caused by the premature loss of deciduous teeth is necessary.


  Conclusion Top


Gerber appliances can reclaim the space lost due to the displacement of mandibular first permanent molar. The appliances provide more distal force and less stress concentration on the crown of the mandibular first permanent molar. More nonlinear analysis studies on Gerber space regainers might be advantageous.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Graber, Vanarsdall, Vig, Huuang. Treatment of patients in the mixed dentition. Orthodontics Current Principles and Techniques. 6th ed. USA. Elsevier Publishers; 2005. P: 545.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Damle SG. Space management. Textbook of Pediatric Dentistry. 5th ed. India: Arya Medi Publishing House; 2018. p. 341.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Bhalajhi SI. Interceptive orthodontics. Orthodontics the Art and Science. 3rd ed. India: Arya Medi Publishing House; 2006.p. 234.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Singh G. Interceptive orthodontic procedures. Textbook of Orthodontics. 2nd ed. New Delhi India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2007;p. 557-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Bondemark L, Karlsson I. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: A randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod 2005;75:699-706.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Papadopoulos MA, Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A. Cephalometric changes following simultaneous first and second maxillary molar distalization using a non-compliance intraoral appliance. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65:123-36.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bondemark L. A comparative analysis of distal maxillary molar movement produced by a new lingual intra-arch Ni-Ti coil appliance and a magnetic appliance. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:683-95.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Paul LD, O'Brien KD, Mandall NA. Upper removable appliance or Jones Jig for distalizing first molars? A randomized clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res 2002;5:238-42.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gianelly AA. Distal movement of the maxillary molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:66-72.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Chandak P, Baliga S, Thosar N. Space regainers in pediatric dentistry. Int Dent Med J Adv Res 2015;1:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed608    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded51    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal